中国金融学术研究网
CHINA FINANCIAL RESEARCH NETWORK

公司财务--资本预算和估值
工作论文
2010-06-08 第3卷 第3期

编: 清华大学经管学院金融学教授。

执行主编: 杨之曙清华大学经济管理学院金融学副教授。


本期目录

Agency Problem and Liquidity Premium: Evidence from China's Stock Ownership Reform

Chao Chen Fudan UniversitySchool of Management
Kevin Chen Hong Kong University of Science & TechnologyDepartment of Accounting
Qinglu Jin Shanghai University of Finance & EconomicsInstitute of Accounting and Finance
Hongqi Yuan Fudan UniversityDepartment of Accounting

Political Connections and Investment Efficiency: Evidence from SOEs and Private Enterprises in China

Shimin Chen China Europe International Business SchoolDepartment of Accounting
Zheng Sun Shanghai University of Finance and EconomicsShanghai University of Finance and Economics
Song Tang The Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversitySchool of Accounting and Finance
Donghui Wu The Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversitySchool of Accounting and Finance

A regulatory increase in minority shareholders’ control over corporate decisions and shareholder value

Zhihong Chen City University of Hong KongDepartment of Accountancy
Bin Ke Pennsylvania State UniversityDepartment of Accounting
Zhifeng Yang City University of Hong KongDepartment of Accountancy

Valuation of China’s Stock Market: Pricing of Earnings Components

In-Mu Haw Texas Christian UniversityM.J. Neeley School of Business
Lee-Seok Hwang Seoul National UniversityCollege of Business Administration
Donghui Wu The Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversitySchool of Accounting and Finance
Woody Wu The Chinese University of Hong KongSchool of Accountancy


论文摘要

Agency Problem and Liquidity Premium: Evidence from China's Stock Ownership Reform

Chao Chen Fudan UniversitySchool of Management
Kevin Chen Hong Kong University of Science & TechnologyDepartment of Accounting
Qinglu Jin Shanghai University of Finance & EconomicsInstitute of Accounting and Finance
Hongqi Yuan Fudan UniversityDepartment of Accounting

Until recently, Chinese companies publicly listed in domestic stock exchanges had two classes of stock: tradable and non-tradable shares. These two classes of stock had the same voting, cash flow, and all other legal rights except that non-tradable shares cannot be transferred at the open markets. From 2005 to mid-2007, Chinese government completed the ownership reform, so-called the Split Share Structure Reform (SSSR), to convert all non-tradable shares into tradable shares. Under this reform process, the holders of non-tradable shares had to negotiate with those of tradable shares to determine how much liquidity premium, or the compensation ratio, non-tradable shareholders have to pay to tradable shareholders in order to obtain the liquidity right. This paper starts with a theoretical model to identify the fundamental factors, including price discount before and after the SSSR reform, the percentage of non-tradable shares in total shares, the volatility of tradable share price, and the lockup period, that should determine the compensation ratio. We show that those factors except price discount before the reform are statistically significant in determining the compensation ratio proposed by non-tradable shareholders. We further show that the agency problems also reveal themselves in the compensation ratios. Specifically, when a firm is controlled by a governmental agency, the compensation is higher. However, the compensation is lower when more concentrated in the top ten holders, especially when shares are held by mutual funds. Thus, the evidence is consistent with the notion that the agency problem exists in China’s fund managers. Finally, we show that the existence of agency problems also reduce the importance of fundamental factors in determining the compensation ratios.

Political Connections and Investment Efficiency: Evidence from SOEs and Private Enterprises in China

Shimin Chen China Europe International Business SchoolDepartment of Accounting
Zheng Sun Shanghai University of Finance and EconomicsShanghai University of Finance and Economics
Song Tang The Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversitySchool of Accounting and Finance
Donghui Wu The Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversitySchool of Accounting and Finance

This study examines the relation between political connections and investment efficiency in China. For listed state-owned enterprises (SOEs), we find that the sensitivity of investment expenditure to investment opportunities is significantly weaker for those with than without political connections. Politically connected SOEs over-invest significantly more than non-connected SOEs. This negative impact of political connections is primarily observed in SOEs controlled by local governments and/or in SOEs without sufficient investment opportunities. However, for private enterprises, investment expenditure is significantly more sensitive to investment opportunities and over-investment is significantly less in politically connected firms than in those without such connections. We further show that over-investment reduces firm value across the board for both SOEs and private enterprises. Taken together, our findings suggest that political connections distort investment behavior, reduce investment efficiency, and damage firm value in listed SOEs in China, but for listed private enterprises, political connections improve investment efficiency, reduce over-investment, and consequently enhance firm value.

A regulatory increase in minority shareholders’ control over corporate decisions and shareholder value

Zhihong Chen City University of Hong KongDepartment of Accountancy
Bin Ke Pennsylvania State UniversityDepartment of Accounting
Zhifeng Yang City University of Hong KongDepartment of Accountancy

Using a 2004 Chinese securities regulation that required equity offering proposals and other major corporate decisions to seek the separate approval of minority shareholders, we empirically test the effect of a regulatory increase in minority shareholders’ control over corporate decisions on shareholder value. While the overall stock market reaction to the announcement of the regulation is insignificant, the stock market reaction is more positive for firms with higher institutional (especially mutual fund) block ownership and more negative for firms with higher individual block ownership. The regulation helps deter management from submitting value decreasing equity offering proposals, especially for firms with higher mutual fund block ownership. In addition, value reducing equity offering proposals submitted in the post-regulation period are more likely to be vetoed in firms with higher block ownership of institutional and individual minority shareholders. Overall, our results suggest that the 2004 regulation increases shareholder value, especially in firms with higher mutual fund block ownership.

Valuation of China’s Stock Market: Pricing of Earnings Components

In-Mu Haw Texas Christian UniversityM.J. Neeley School of Business
Lee-Seok Hwang Seoul National UniversityCollege of Business Administration
Donghui Wu The Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversitySchool of Accounting and Finance
Woody Wu The Chinese University of Hong KongSchool of Accountancy

This paper investigates whether Chinese equity investors price major earnings components correctly. Total earnings are decomposed into core and non-core earnings according to a classification framework of Chinese accounting principles. The results show that, as expected, core earnings are more persistent than non-core earnings. Most importantly, the market underestimates (overestimates) the value implications of changes in current core (non-core) earnings for future earnings changes. Therefore, future stock returns can be predicted based on the information that is contained in the components of current earnings. Both portfolio tests and regression analysis generate economically significant abnormal returns that are robust to sensitivity checks.


      中国金融研究学术网(China Financial Research Network)发表金融研究工作论文和已发表论文的摘要。
      
      如果您如希望按期收到最新的金融研究工作论文和已发表论文的摘要,请访问http://www.cfrn.com.cn,注册即可。
      
      您如果想要发表您的工作论文或已发表论文的摘要,请访问http://www.cfrn.com.cn,注册,登录,然后上传。
      
      中国金融研究学术网不拥有所发表的工作论文和已发表论文摘要的版权。读者可以免费浏览和下载。      
	  
      如果您有任何问题,请联系我们。通过E-Mail发送至:cfrn@sem.tsinghua.edu.cn。或者通过邮寄方式,寄送至:清华大学经济管理学院中国金融研究中心。邮编:100084。
      

Copyright @ 2008 China Center for Financial Research,Tsinghua University. All Rights Reserved.
版权所有 清华大学中国金融研究中心